Monday, April 30, 2012

GBI Director has the right idea!

Georgia Bureau of Investigation director Vernon Keenan isn’t known for being soft on crime, but he is working to keep one class of “criminals” out of jail.

 

Keenan (pictured at left), like sheriffs statewide, contends law enforcement turns jails into asylums at huge human and financial costs. Now, a study in which the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) is partnering with the Georgia chapter of the National Alliance of Mentally ill (NAMI), shows how to keep people with schizophrenia, bipolar and other mental diseases out of jail, Keenan said.

“The project is designed to prevent the acutely mentally ill from routinely being incarcerated,” he said. “It is a humane program, but one that also has significant taxpayer savings. The participants have been arrested dozens of times and been in and out of jail, usually for minor crimes.”

NAMI got a $2 million grant from the nonprofit Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation and another $2.3 million from other donors recruited 100 mental patients from Georgia Regional Hospital in Savannah and assigned each patient to caseworkers who monitored medications and lifestyle. The two-year program ends next year.

The GBI flagged all the names in the law enforcement database so when an officer checks the database for any warrants, a message instructs the officer to call the caseworker before taking the patient to jail, usually for crimes such as criminal trespass, shoplifting, disturbing the peace or minor assaults, Keenan said.

The caseworker also gets an email about the arrest and contacts the officer at the scene. If the officer decides there is no public safety reason to take the person to jail, the offender will be handed over to the caseworker who will decide the most appropriate next move.

The project has had a few bumps, she said, especially when officers didn’t check the Georgia Crime Information Center. “Our patient No. 17 was totally psychotic several months ago and he went into a convenience store and started drinking a Coca-Cola and walked out of the store,” said Nora Haynes, who is overseeing the project. “That Coca-Cola ended up costing the taxpayers $1,160 because instead of checking the GCIC system, the officer just took him to the jail. It took us 21 days to get him out.”

Currently the project is only funded in 34 sparsely populated counties in southeast Georgia, but sheriffs across the state are paying close attention to its results. Last year, an investigation by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported state jails house mentally ill inmates for months — even years — for minor crimes because they’re incompetent for trial.

“We’re doing absolutely the wrong thing by incarcerating people with mental illness,” said Oconee County Sheriff Scott Berry, president of the Georgia Sheriffs’ Association. “There has to be some community-based-response system that is set up not just in a few counties in Georgia but all of Georgia.

“It is not right to shackle a mentally ill person and throw them in the back of a patrol car. It is not humane.”

The costs also get extreme for both local tax dollars, which fund the jails, and state tax dollars, which fund psychiatric hospitals. Last year, metro Atlanta jails reported the mentally ill accounted for at least 20 percent to 30 percent of the inmates. Fulton County spent about $4 million on jailed mentally ill. Cobb County spent more than $1 million a year and DeKalb County officials said they spent $2.2 million in 2010.

State costs are even more dramatic. The 35 patients who have been in the study for at least six months have cost state taxpayers $2.5 million because of repeated stays — 458 in all — at Georgia Regional Hospital, 83 of the visits coming within six months before enrolling in the project, according to NAMI numbers.

Since joining the project, the 35 patients have only had 26 stays — with three patients being responsible for half that number.

Fulton County Commission Chairman John Eaves said the project sounded worth emulating. Local law enforcement has to move past jailing the mentally ill people, he said.

“There has to be a more effective and efficient means of dealing with this population,” he said. “If they are not a threat to society and their actions result from their mental illness, there should be a way of hooking them up with mental-health services.”

Haynes said legislators were impressed with the early results — at least enough to award $500,000 in state funding. Former first lady Rosalynn Carter, a longtime advocate for the mentally ill, also endorsed the program. Mental health advocates are putting strong hopes on Gov. Nathan Deal, who voiced support for drug courts and mental health courts as mechanisms to reduce the prison population.

Marietta police Chief Dan Flynn questioned whether the state would ever fund enough mental health treatment alternatives to make the program viable statewide. Critics contend the Legislature doesn’t fund mental health programs in part because local law enforcement dollars end up directed at providing some level of treatment in the jails.

“Common sense tells you that these people aren’t going to do any better in a jail locked up with criminals,” he said. “My only skepticism is what is the end game here? Are we going to have new places to send them for treatment?”
****

As someone who works with those with mental disorders, I can only say why didn't someone do this sooner?

-- Walter

Monday, April 16, 2012

What's happened to ethics and honesty?



Celestine Sibley
I've been writing now for just shy of thirty (30) years so I was influenced by what I considered some of the best editors / authors / writers to come out of the south. Names like Reg Murphy, Lewis Grizzard, and Celestine Sibley (pictured at left). I've always done my best to follow their example and be as down-to-earth and honest in my writing as is humanly possible. For that reason, this story from today's New York Times was disconcerting to me:


Simply put, what has happened to ethics and honesty among some writers? Please don't get me wrong, I don't mean to be holier-than-thou, because I've made errors in my writing too . . . but never an intentional misstatement of facts and never a factual error severe enough to warrant a full-blown retraction of what I wrote. I had what, at least one editor considered, a "bad habit" of double-checking and occasionally triple-checking my facts.  On more than one occasion, he and I locked horns because he changed my wording. (For some reason, I could never get him to grasp the concept that there's a legal difference between an incendiary fire and an arson fire and that they were terms that couldn't be used interchangeably. Of course this was also the man who thought nothing of going under yellow "Fire Line" tape to capture a picture he wanted.) Unfortunately it was actions such as his that lead to retractions like are discussed in the article above. I can only hope my unofficial mentors aren't spinning in their graves at what our beloved profession has become.

Until next time . . .